Stran & Company, Inc. Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405]

Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405]

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2025

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A.	ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Organization - Stran & Company, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and commenced operations on November 17, 1995. The Company re-incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 24, 2021.

On August 23, 2024, Stran Loyalty Solutions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (the “Purchaser” or “Stran Loyalty Solutions”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Secured Party Sale Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2024 (the “Sale Agreement”), between Stran Loyalty Solutions and Sallyport Commercial Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Secured Party”), pursuant to which Stran Loyalty Solutions agreed to purchase, on an as-is basis, all of the rights and interests of Gander Group, in and to substantially all of the assets of Gander Group (the “Gander Group Assets”) from Secured Party as a private sale pursuant to Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “Gander Group Transaction”).

The Gander Group Transaction was treated as a business combination in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations. Stran Loyalty Solutions is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and Gander Group Louisiana, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Stran Loyalty Solutions.

Unless otherwise stated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, references to “we”, “our”, or the “Company” refer to Stran & Company, Inc. The Company is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.

Operations - The Company is an outsourced marketing solutions provider that sells branded products to customers. The Company purchases products and branding through various third-party manufacturers and decorators and resells the finished goods to customers.

In addition to selling branded products, the Company offers clients custom sourcing capabilities; a flexible and customizable e-commerce solution for promoting branded merchandise and other promotional products, managing promotional loyalty and incentives, print collateral, and event assets, order and inventory management, and designing and hosting online retail popup shops, fixed public retail online stores, and online business-to-business service offerings; creative and merchandising services; warehousing/fulfillment and distribution; print-on-demand; kitting; point of sale displays; and loyalty and incentive programs.

Method of Accounting - The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. (“U.S. GAAP”).

Principles of Consolidation - The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Emerging Growth Company - The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s consolidated financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Company follows the guidance in ASC 820 for its financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period.

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:

	Level 1:	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

	Level 2:	Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

	Level 3:	Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The carrying value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, rewards program liability, and sales tax payable are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Investments - The Company’s investments consist of U.S. treasury bills, corporate bonds, mutual funds, and money market funds. Investments are classified as available-for-sale, recorded at fair value and considered current on the balance sheet.

Concentration of Credit Risk - Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable and deposits in excess of federally insured limits. These risks are managed by performing ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition and by maintaining all deposits in high quality financial institutions.

As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company maintained deposits in four banks that exceeded the federal insured deposit limit of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company had no major customers to which sales accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues. The Company had accounts receivable from two customers amounting to 24.1% of the total accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2025.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had no major customer to which sales accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues. The Company had accounts receivable from two customers amounting to 20.5% of the total accounts receivable balance.

10.

Inventory - Inventory consists of finished goods (branded products) and goods in process (un-branded products awaiting decoration). All inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value.

11.

Property and Equipment, Net - Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred whereas major betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is provided using straight-line and accelerated methods. The Company’s property and equipment asset classes are depreciated over a five year expected useful life, with the exception of leasehold improvements, which are depreciated over the lesser of five years or remaining lease term.

12.

Goodwill and Long-lived Assets- Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is not amortized; rather, it is subject to a periodic assessment for impairment. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, the Company reviews goodwill for possible impairment annually on October 1 every year or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

In connection with its annual or interim impairment assessments, the Company first has the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. In performing this qualitative assessment, the Company considers various events and circumstances, including, but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, recent market transactions, changes in cost factors, overall financial performance, changes in projected future cash flows, and other relevant entity-specific events. If, after evaluating these factors, the Company concludes that it is not more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value, no further testing is required.

The Company may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to a quantitative goodwill impairment test. If a quantitative test is performed, the Company estimates the fair value of the reporting unit and compares it to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount, if any, by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, limited to the carrying amount of goodwill.

The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is determined using a combination of the income approach and the market approach. Under the income approach, fair value is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows, which requires the Company to make significant judgments and assumptions, including projections of future revenue growth, operating margins, capital expenditures, working capital requirements, income taxes, long-term growth rates used to estimate terminal value, and discount rates. The market approach uses valuation multiples derived from comparable publicly traded companies and recent market transactions and is used to corroborate the results of the income approach.

The fair value measurements derived from the discounted cash flow model rely primarily on unobservable inputs and therefore are classified as Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy. To the extent used, market-based inputs such as quoted share prices and observable market multiples are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 inputs, as applicable.

Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.

13.

Revenue Recognition - The Company accounts for revenue under ASC 606, Revenue for Contracts with Customers. Revenue is generated through various types of transactions, including promotional product sales, administering a customer’s rewards program, administering redemption code programs, and additional contract add-ons to enhance customer experience. The Company follows the five step model of revenue recognition:

identify the contract(s) with a customer;

ii.

identify the performance obligations in the contract;

iii.

determine the transaction price;

iv.

allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations within the contract; and

recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

The Company’s contract review and approval process varies depending on whether the customer transaction involves a one-time sale or a longer-term customer relationship. For customers entering into longer-term arrangements, the Company typically executes a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”), which establishes the general contractual framework governing the relationship. Specific goods or services are then provided pursuant to individual customer orders, statements of work, or purchase orders issued under the MSA. For one-time sales, transactions may be approved through email confirmation, electronic signature, or other documented customer authorization. Once the contract is identified and approved, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within the contract to determine whether each promised good or service is a performance obligation. The Company identifies each piece of promotional product as an individual performance obligation based on the following fact pattern. Customers can benefit from each item of promotional product produced on its own. Each piece of promotional product does not significantly modify or customize other promotional products and are not highly interdependent or interrelated with each other. The Company can, and frequently does, break portions of contracts into separate shipments to meet customer demands. As such, each piece of promotional product is considered a separate and distinct performance obligation.

The transaction price for the majority of the Company’s sales, which are recorded net of sales tax, can be clearly identified in a significant majority of the contracts due to an observable selling price. The transaction price is then allocated to the performance obligation(s), i.e. promotional product. The agreements include clearly identified prices.

The Company recognizes revenue when or as performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. Stran evaluates transfer of control primarily from the customer’s perspective. Considering the transaction from the customer’s perspective reduces the risk that revenue is recognized for activities that do not transfer control of a good or service to the customer. Management determines, at contract inception, whether control of a good or service transfers to a customer over time or at a point in time. The assessment of whether control transfers over time or at a point in time is critical to the timing of revenue recognition. Payments from customers received in advance of the performance obligation being met are recognized as liabilities until performance occurs. Receivables from customers are generally due within 30 days of the invoice date, which represents the standard payment terms for the majority of customers; however, certain customers are granted extended payment terms of up to 90 days.

14.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses - Accounts receivable at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, includes allowance for credit losses of $1,378 and $791 (inclusive of $829 and $327 for related party receivables), respectively. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2023 was $17,076 (inclusive of $853 for related party receivables and net of an allowance for credit losses of $317).

	December 31, 2025			December 31, 2024
Trade accounts receivable	$	17,801		$	18,556
Less: allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable		(549	)		(464	)
Total accounts receivable, net	$	17,252		$	18,092
Accounts receivable - related party	$	829		$	900
Less: allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable - related party		(829	)		(327	)
Total accounts receivable - related party, net	$	—		$	573
Total accounts receivable from all sources, net	$	17,252		$	18,665

The Company evaluates our accounts receivable through a continuous process of assessing our portfolio on an individual customer and overall basis. This process consists of a thorough review of historical collection experience, current aging status of the customer accounts and the financial condition of our customers. The Company also considers the economic environment of our customers, both from a marketplace and geographic perspective, in evaluating the need for an allowance. Based on our review of these factors, we establish or adjust allowances for specific customers. Credit losses can vary substantially over time and the process involves judgment and estimation that require a number of assumptions about matters that are uncertain. Accordingly, our results of operations can be affected by adjustments to the allowance due to actual write-offs that differ from estimated amounts. See Note Q, “Credit Losses,” to the consolidated financial statements included in this report for more information.

15.

Freight - The Company includes freight charges as a component of cost of goods sold.

16.

Leases - The Company’s lease arrangements relate primarily to office space. The Company’s leases may include renewal options and rent escalation clauses. The Company is typically required to make fixed minimum rent payments relating to its right to use an underlying leased asset.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception and classifies its leases at commencement. Operating leases are presented as right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and the corresponding lease liabilities are included in operating lease liabilities, current and operating lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset, and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation for lease payments in exchange for the ability to use the asset for the duration of the lease term. The Company does not recognize short term leases that have a term of twelve months or less as ROU assets or lease liabilities.

ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date and determined using the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing since the Company’s leases do not include an implicit interest rate. The estimated incremental borrowing rate considers market data, actual lease economic environment, and actual lease term at commencement date. The lease term may include options to extend when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. The Company recognizes lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company has lease agreements which contain both lease and non-lease components, which it has not elected to account for as a single lease component. As such, minimum lease payments exclude fixed payments for non-lease components within a lease agreement, in addition to excluding variable lease payments not dependent on an index or rate, such as common area maintenance, operating expenses, utilities, or other costs that are subject to fluctuation from period to period.

17.

Segments - The Company operates in two reportable segments: Stran & Company, Inc. and Stran Loyalty Solutions. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is considered to be the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The CODM reviews operating results on an aggregate basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance by using certain financial information, including segmented internal profit and loss statements prepared on a basis not consistent with U.S. GAAP.

For each of its segments, the CODM uses segment revenue, gross margin and segment operating income in the annual budgeting and forecasting process. The CODM considers budget-to-actual variances on a monthly basis for profit measures when making decisions about allocating capital and personnel to the segments. The CODM also uses segment gross margin for evaluating product pricing and segment operating income to assess the performance for each segment by comparing the results and return on assets of each segment with one another. The CODM uses segment gross margin and segment operating income in determining the compensation of certain employees.

During the periods presented, the Company reported its financial performance based on the following segments: Stran & Company and Stran Loyalty Solutions.

18.

Uncertainty in Income and Other Taxes - The Company adopted the standards for Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which required the Company to report any uncertain tax positions and to adjust its financial statements for the impact thereof. Any accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are recorded as components of income tax expense.

As of December 31, 2024, the Company determined it had uncertain tax positions of $3,141. During the quarter ended September 30, 2025, the Company reversed its previously recorded uncertain tax positions considering the filing of its tax return for the year ended December 31, 2024. This reversal did not affect the income tax provision or tax balances recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as there were only offsetting changes in individual temporary differences. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements.

19.

Income Taxes - The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Massachusetts, New York, and various other state jurisdictions. Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets that are not more likely than not to be realized. The Company monitors the realizability of our deferred tax assets taking into account all relevant factors at each reporting period. In completing our assessment of realizability of our deferred tax assets, we consider our history of income (loss) measured at pre-tax income (loss) adjusted for permanent book-tax differences on a jurisdictional basis, volatility in actual earnings, excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation in recent prior years and impacts of the timing of reversal of existing temporary differences. The Company also relies on the assessment of projected future results of business operations, including uncertainty in future operating results relative to historical results, volatility in the market price of our common stock and its performance over time, variable macroeconomic conditions impacting our ability to forecast future taxable income, and changes in business that may affect the existence and magnitude of future taxable income. The Company’s valuation allowance assessment is based on the best estimate of future results considering all available information.

20.

Loss per Share - Basic loss per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include the issuance of potential shares of common stock for outstanding stock options and warrants.

21.

Stock-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for its stock-based awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. This guidance requires all stock-based payments to employees to be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company is recognizing compensation costs only for those stock-based awards expected to vest. Cumulative compensation expense is at least equal to the compensation expense for vested awards. Stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the service period of each award. The Company records compensation cost as an element of general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

22.

Stock Option and Warrant Valuation - Stock option and warrant valuation models require the input of assumptions. The fair value of stock-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option model with a volatility figure derived from an index of historical stock prices for comparable entities. For warrants and stock options issued to non-employees, the Company accounts for the expected life based on the contractual life of the warrants and stock options. For employees, the Company accounts for the expected life of options in accordance with the “simplified” method, which is used for “plain-vanilla” options, as defined in the accounting standards codification. The risk-free interest rate was determined from the implied yields of U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with a remaining life consistent with the expected term of the options.

23.

Sales Tax - Sales tax collected from customers is recorded as a liability, pending remittance to the taxing jurisdiction. The Company remits sales, use, and GST taxes to Massachusetts, other state jurisdictions, and Canada, respectively.

24.

Advertising - The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, advertising costs amounted to $467 and $511, respectively.

25.

Use of Estimates - The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

26.

Derivative Financial Instruments - The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”) and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own common stock and whether the warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding.

27.

Contingent Earn-Out Liabilities - The Company measures its contingent earn-out liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements are (i) the operating income projections (projected gross profit amounts within the risk-neutral framework) over the earn-out period (generally three or five years), (ii) the strike price, and (iii) volatility. Significant increases or decreases to any of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher or lower liability, with a higher liability capped by the contractual maximum of the contingent earn-out obligations. Ultimately, the liability will be equivalent to the amount paid, and the difference between the fair value estimate and amount paid will be recorded in earnings. The amount paid that is less than or equal to the contingent earn-out liability on the acquisition date is reflected as cash used in financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

28.

Reclassification - Certain prior period statement of cash flow amounts have been reclassified to conform to the Company’s current period presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on the Company’s previously reported cash flows.

29.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Adopted:

ASU 2024-01 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)

In March 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2024-01, which clarifies the accounting for profits interest awards. This update provides guidance on determining whether a profits interest or similar award falls within the scope of ASC 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation or other guidance. The ASU aims to ensure consistency and transparency in the accounting for these awards by providing clearer criteria and illustrative examples.

The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2025. Its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2023-09 – Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, which amends the guidance on income tax disclosures. This update requires that an entity disclose specific categories in the effective tax rate reconciliation as well as provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a qualitative threshold. Further, ASU 2023-09 requires certain disclosures of state versus federal income tax expense and taxes paid. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company prospectively adopted the required disclosures in its annual financials statements for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2025. The adoption of this guidance did not affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. See Note O for further details.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Not Yet Adopted:

ASU 2024-03 - Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, which requires the disaggregation, in the notes to the financial statements, of certain cost and expense captions presented on the face of the Company’s statements of operations, to provide enhanced transparency to investors. The update may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its disclosures.

ASU 2025-05 – Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, which provides all entities with a practical expedient for use in developing reasonable and supportable forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses, upon which an entity may assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. The update must be applied prospectively. ASU 2025-05 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with prospective application. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its disclosures.

ASU 2025-06 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, which is intended to improve the operability and application of guidance related to capitalized software development costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2025-05 permits an entity to apply the new guidance under either a prospective transition approach, a modified transition approach, or a retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its disclosures.

ASU 2025-11 - Interim Reporting (Topic 290): Narrow-Scope Improvements

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, which further clarifies certain interim disclosure requirements. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2027. Early adoption is permitted and adoption can be applied either on a prospective or retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on its disclosures.

No other new accounting pronouncements adopted or issued had or are expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.