Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2024 |
|---|
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
|
| Organization |
|
1. |
Organization - Stran & Company, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and commenced operations on November 17, 1995. The Company re-incorporated under the laws of the State
of Nevada on May 24, 2021. |
On August 23, 2024, Stran Loyalty Solutions,
LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (the “Purchaser” or “Stran Loyalty Solutions”), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company, entered into a Secured Party Sale Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2024 (the “Sale Agreement”), between Stran
Loyalty Solutions and Sallyport Commercial Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Secured Party”), pursuant
to which Stran Loyalty Solutions agreed to purchase, on an as-is basis, all of the rights and interests of Gander Group, in and to substantially
all of the assets of Gander Group (the “Gander Group Assets”) from Secured Party as a private sale pursuant to Article 9 of
the Uniform Commercial Code (the “Gander Group Transaction”).
The Gander Group Transaction was treated
as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Stran Loyalty Solutions is a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company and Gander Group Louisiana, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Stran Loyalty Solutions.
|
| Operations |
|
2. |
Operations - The Company is an outsourced marketing solutions provider that sells branded products to
customers. The Company purchases products and branding through various third-party manufacturers and decorators and resells the finished
goods to customers. |
In addition to selling branded products,
the Company offers clients custom sourcing capabilities; a flexible and customizable e-commerce solution for promoting branded merchandise
and other promotional products, managing promotional loyalty and incentives, print collateral, and event assets, order and inventory management,
and designing and hosting online retail popup shops, fixed public retail online stores, and online business-to-business service offerings;
creative and merchandising services; warehousing/fulfillment and distribution; print-on-demand; kitting; point of sale displays; and loyalty
and incentive programs.
|
| Method of Accounting |
|
3. |
Method of Accounting - The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of
accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. (“U.S. GAAP”). |
|
| Principles of Consolidation |
| |
4. |
Principles of Consolidation - The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
|
| Emerging Growth Company |
|
5. |
Emerging Growth Company - The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section
2(a) of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups
Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are
applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply
with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive
compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote
on executive compensation and approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS
Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies
(that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting
standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements
that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of
such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public
or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies
adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s consolidated financial statements with another public
company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition
period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used. |
|
| Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
6. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly
liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. |
|
| Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
7. |
Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Company follows the guidance in
ASC 820 for its financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. |
The fair value of the Company’s
financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with
the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the
use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions
about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities
based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:
| |
Level 1: |
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. |
| |
|
|
| |
Level 2: |
Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. |
| |
|
|
| |
Level 3: |
Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The carrying value of certain financial
instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable are carried at historical cost basis, which
approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
|
| Investments |
|
8. |
Investments - The Company’s investments consist of U.S. treasury bills, corporate bonds, mutual
funds, and money market funds. Investments are classified as available-for-sale, recorded at fair value and considered current on the
balance sheet. |
|
| Concentration of Credit Risk |
|
9. |
Concentration of Credit Risk - Financial instruments that
potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable and deposits in excess of federally
insured limits. These risks are managed by performing ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition and by maintaining
all deposits in high quality financial institutions. |
During the years ended December 31,
2024 and 2023, the Company maintained deposits in four banks that exceeded the federal insured deposit limit of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
For
the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had no major customer to which sales accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s
revenues. The Company had accounts receivable from two customers amounting to 20.5% of the total accounts receivable balance.
For
the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company had one major customer to which sales accounted for approximately 14.4% of the Company’s
revenues and 0.8% of the total accounts receivable balance.
|
| Inventory |
|
10. |
Inventory - Inventory consists of finished goods (branded
products) and goods in process (un-branded products awaiting decoration). All inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
method) or net realizable value. |
|
| Property and Equipment, Net |
|
11. |
Property and Equipment, Net - Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are
charged to expense as incurred whereas major betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is provided using straight-line and accelerated
methods over five years. |
|
| Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
12. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets - Goodwill represents the excess purchase price of the acquired businesses
over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized; rather, it is subject to a periodic assessment for
impairment. The Company reviews goodwill for possible impairment annually on October 1 every year or whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. |
To determine whether goodwill is impaired,
annually or more frequently if needed, the Company performs a multi-step impairment test. Impairment testing is conducted at the reporting
unit level. The Company first has the option to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying
value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Under ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, the qualitative assessment
requires the consideration of factors such as recent market transactions, macroeconomic conditions, and changes in projected future cash
flows or planned revenue or earnings of the reporting unit as potential indicators when determining the need for a quantitative assessment
of impairment. The Company may also elect to skip the qualitative testing and proceed directly to the quantitative testing. When performing
quantitative testing, the Company first estimates the fair values of its reporting unit using a combination of an income and market approach.
To determine fair values, the Company is required to make assumptions about a wide variety of internal and external factors. Significant
assumptions used in the impairment analysis include financial projections of free cash flow (including significant assumptions about operations
including the rate of future revenue growth, capital requirements, and income taxes), long-term growth rates for determining terminal
value, and discount rates. Comparative market multiples are used to corroborate the results of the discounted cash flow test. These assumptions
require significant judgement. The single step is to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the carrying
value of the reporting unit, including goodwill. If we conclude based on our qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that
the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we then measure the fair value of the reporting unit and compare its
fair value to its carrying value (Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test). The majority of the inputs used in the discounted cash flow model
are unobservable and thus are considered to be Level 3 inputs. The inputs for the market capitalization calculation are considered Level
1 inputs.
|
| Revenue Recognition |
|
13. |
Revenue Recognition - The Company accounts for revenue under ASC 606, Revenue for Contracts with Customers
(“ASC 606”). Revenue is generated through various types of transactions, including promotional product sales, administering
a customer’s rewards program, administering redemption code programs, and additional contract add-ons to enhance customer experience.
The Company follows the five step model of revenue recognition: |
|
i. |
identify the contract(s) with a customer; |
|
ii. |
identify the performance obligations in the contract; |
|
iii. |
determine the transaction price; |
|
iv. |
allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations within the contract; and |
|
v. |
recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
The Company’s contract assessment
and approval varies based on whether the customer requests a one-time sale or a long-term contract. Customers with long-term contracts
require signed Master Sales Agreements, while one-time sales contracts may be approved via email, electronic signature, or verbally. Once
the contract is identified and approved, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within the contract to determine whether
each promised good or service is a performance obligation. The Company identifies each piece of promotional product as an individual performance
obligation based on the following fact pattern. Customers can benefit from each item of promotional product produced on its own. Each
piece of promotional product does not significantly modify or customize other promotional products and are not highly interdependent or
interrelated with each other. The Company can, and frequently does, break portions of contracts into separate shipments to meet Customer
demands. As such, each piece of promotional product is considered a separate and distinct performance obligation.
The transaction price for the majority
of the Company’s sales can be clearly identified in a significant majority of the contracts due to an observable selling price. The transaction
price is then allocated to the performance obligation(s), i.e. promotional product. The agreements include clearly identified prices.
The Company recognizes revenue when
or as performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. Stran evaluates transfer
of control primarily from the customer’s perspective. Considering the transaction from the customer’s perspective reduces
the risk that revenue is recognized for activities that do not transfer control of a good or service to the customer. Management determines,
at contract inception, whether control of a good or service transfers to a customer over time or at a point in time. The assessment of
whether control transfers over time or at a point in time is critical to the timing of revenue recognition.
|
| Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses |
|
14. |
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses - Accounts
receivable as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, includes allowance for credit losses of $791 (inclusive of $327 for related party receivables)
and $317, respectively. |
| |
|
December 31, 2024 |
|
|
December 31, 2023 |
|
| Trade accounts receivable |
|
$ |
18,556 |
|
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
| Less: allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
| Total accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
18,092 |
|
|
$ |
16,223 |
|
| Accounts receivable - related party |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
| Less: allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable - related party |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| Total accounts receivable - related party, net |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
| Total accounts receivable from all sources |
|
$ |
18,665 |
|
|
$ |
17,076 |
|
The Company evaluates our accounts receivable
through a continuous process of assessing our portfolio on an individual customer and overall basis. This process consists of a thorough
review of historical collection experience, current aging status of the customer accounts and the financial condition of our customers.
The Company also considers the economic environment of our customers, both from a marketplace and geographic perspective, in evaluating
the need for an allowance. Based on our review of these factors, we establish or adjust allowances for specific customers. Credit losses
can vary substantially over time and the process involves judgment and estimation that require a number of assumptions about matters that
are uncertain. Accordingly, our results of operations can be affected by adjustments to the allowance due to actual write-offs that differ
from estimated amounts. See Note S, “Credit Losses,” to our financial statements included in this report for more information.
|
| Freight |
|
15. |
Freight - The Company includes freight charges as a component of cost of goods sold. |
|
| Leases |
|
16. |
Leases - The Company’s lease arrangements relate primarily to office space. The Company’s
leases may include renewal options and rent escalation clauses. The Company is typically required to make fixed minimum rent payments
relating to its right to use an underlying leased asset. |
The Company determines if an arrangement
is a lease at inception and classifies its leases at commencement. Operating leases are presented as right-of-use (“ROU”)
assets and the corresponding lease liabilities are included in operating lease liabilities, current and operating lease liabilities on
the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset, and lease
liabilities represent the Company’s obligation for lease payments in exchange for the ability to use the asset for the duration
of the lease term. The Company does not recognize short term leases that have a term of twelve months or less as ROU assets or lease liabilities.
ROU assets and lease liabilities are
recognized at commencement date and determined using the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The Company
uses an incremental borrowing rate based on estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing since the Company’s leases do
not include an implicit interest rate. The estimated incremental borrowing rate considers market data, actual lease economic environment,
and actual lease term at commencement date. The lease term may include options to extend when it is reasonably certain that the Company
will exercise that option. The Company recognizes lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company has lease agreements which
contain both lease and non-lease components, which it has not elected to account for as a single lease component. As such, minimum lease
payments exclude fixed payments for non-lease components within a lease agreement, in addition to excluding variable lease payments not
dependent on an index or rate, such as common area maintenance, operating expenses, utilities, or other costs that are subject to fluctuation
from period to period.
|
| Segments |
|
17. |
Segments - In its operation of the business, management, including our chief operating decision maker
(CODM), who is also our CEO, reviews certain financial information, including segmented internal profit and loss statements prepared on
a basis not consistent with GAAP. |
For each of its segments, the CODM uses
segment revenue, gross margin and segment operating income in the annual budgeting and forecasting process. The CODM considers budget-to-actual
variances on a monthly basis for profit measures when making decisions about allocating capital and personnel to the segments. The CODM
also uses segment gross margin for evaluating product pricing and segment operating income to assess the performance for each segment
by comparing the results and return on assets of each segment with one another. The CODM uses segment gross margin and segment operating
income in determining the compensation of certain employees.
During the periods presented, we reported
our financial performance based on the following segments: Stran & Company, Inc. and Stran Loyalty Solutions, LLC.
|
| Uncertainty in Income and Other Taxes |
|
18. |
Uncertainty in Income and Other Taxes - The Company adopted
the standards for Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which required the Company to report any uncertain tax positions and to
adjust its financial statements for the impact thereof. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company determined it had uncertain tax
positions of $3,141 and $2,448. The Company believes the impact will not be material as it will be able to utilize net operating losses
to offset a majority of the risk. The Company recorded a nominal amount of interest expense which is included as part of income tax expense. |
|
| Income Taxes |
|
19. |
Income Taxes - Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial
statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes. Deferred taxes are provided for differences between the basis of assets
and liabilities for financial statements and income tax purposes offset by a valuation allowance for 2024 and 2023. |
|
| Earnings/ Loss per Share |
|
20. |
Earnings/ Loss per Share -Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of
shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock
method. Dilutive potential common shares include the issuance of potential shares of common stock for outstanding stock options and warrants. |
|
| Stock-Based Compensation |
|
21. |
Stock-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for its stock-based awards in accordance with ASC 718,
Compensation - Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires all stock-based payments to employees to be recognized in the consolidated statements
of operations based on their fair values. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of options
granted. The Company is recognizing compensation costs only for those stock-based awards expected to vest after considering expected forfeitures.
Cumulative compensation expense is at least equal to the compensation expense for vested awards. Stock-based compensation is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the service period of each award. The Company records compensation cost as an element of general and administrative
expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. |
|
| Stock Option and Warrant Valuation |
|
22. |
Stock Option and Warrant Valuation - Stock option and warrant valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions. The fair value of stock-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option model with a volatility
figure derived from an index of historical stock prices for comparable entities. For warrants and stock options issued to non-employees,
the Company accounts for the expected life based on the contractual life of the warrants and stock options. For employees, the Company
accounts for the expected life of options in accordance with the “simplified” method, which is used for “plain-vanilla”
options, as defined in the accounting standards codification. The risk-free interest rate was determined from the implied yields of U.S.
Treasury zero-coupon bonds with a remaining life consistent with the expected term of the options. |
|
| Sales Tax |
|
23. |
Sales Tax - Sales tax collected from customers is recorded as a liability, pending remittance to the taxing
jurisdiction. The Company remits sales, use, and GST taxes to Massachusetts,
other state jurisdictions, and Canada, respectively. |
|
| Use of Estimates |
|
24. |
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosure of certain assets,
liabilities and expenses. The most significant estimates in the Company’s financial statements relate to the fair value of assets
and liabilities assumed in acquisitions and the fair value of the contingent earnout liability. These estimates and assumptions are based
on current facts, historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of expenses that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from these estimates. To the extent there are material
differences between the estimates and actual results, the Company’s future results of operations will be affected. |
|
| Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
25. |
Derivative Financial Instruments - The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified
instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity (“ASC 480”) and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers
whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480,
and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed
to the Company’s own common stock and whether the warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in
a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires
the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while
the warrants are outstanding. |
|
| Contingent Earn-Out Liabilities |
|
26. |
Contingent Earn-Out Liabilities - The Company measures its contingent earn-out liabilities at fair value
on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The significant unobservable inputs used in the
fair value measurements are (i) the operating income projections (projected gross profit amounts within the risk-neutral framework) over
the earn-out period (generally three or five years), (ii) the strike price, and (iii) volatility. Significant increases or decreases to
any of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher or lower liability, with a higher liability capped by the contractual
maximum of the contingent earn-out obligations. Ultimately, the liability will be equivalent to the amount paid, and the difference between
the fair value estimate and amount paid will be recorded in earnings. The amount paid that is less than or equal to the contingent earn-out
liability on the acquisition date is reflected as cash used in financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Any
amount paid in excess of the contingent earn-out liability on the acquisition date is reflected as cash used in operating activities in
the consolidated statements of cash flows. |
|
| Reclassifications |
|
27. |
Reclassifications - Certain immaterial reclassifications have been made to the Company’s previously issued consolidated financial statements. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income, cash flows or shareholders’ equity. |
|
| Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
28. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - Management has reviewed the following recent accounting pronouncements: |
2023-07 – Segment Reporting
(Topic 280)
In November 2023, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2023-07, which amends the guidance on segment reporting. This update enhances the disclosure requirements
for reportable segments, primarily by requiring more detailed information about significant segment expenses. The amendments also clarify
the circumstances under which an entity can disclose multiple measures of segment profit or loss and provide new segment disclosure requirements
for entities with a single reportable segment.
The guidance is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption
permitted. The guidance is to be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company adopted
ASU 2023-07 using a retrospective approach for all prior periods presented. The adoption of ASU 2023-07 did not have a material impact
on the consolidated financial statements of the Company or its results of operations.
2023-09 – Income Taxes (Topic
740)
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2023-09, which amends the guidance on income tax disclosures. This update aims to improve the transparency
and usefulness of income tax disclosures by requiring entities to provide more detailed information about the nature and effects of income
tax uncertainties, the components of income tax expense, and the effective tax rate reconciliation. Additionally, the ASU mandates enhanced
disclosures about deferred tax assets and liabilities, including the valuation allowance and the impact of tax law changes.
The guidance is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2024, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the timing and impacts of adoption of this ASU.
2024-01 – Compensation –
Stock Compensation (Topic 718)
In March 2024, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2024-01, which clarifies the accounting for profits interest awards. This update provides guidance on
determining whether a profits interest or similar award falls within the scope of ASC 718 (Compensation—Stock Compensation) or other
guidance. The ASU aims to ensure consistency and transparency in the accounting for these awards by providing clearer criteria and illustrative
examples.
The guidance is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the timing
and impacts of adoption of this ASU.
2024-03 - Income Statement - Reporting
Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosure
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU
2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income
Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires the disaggregation, in the notes to the financial statements, of certain
cost and expense captions presented on the face of the Company’s Statement of Operations, to provide enhanced transparency to investors.
The update may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating
the impact ASU 2024-03 will have on its disclosures.
|
| Subsequent Events |
|
29. |
Subsequent Events - Management has evaluated events occurring after the balance sheet date through April
14, 2025, the date on which the financial statements were filed. |
|